Claimed "HIV CURE" will subject mothers and babies to AZT poisoning

Claims of a baby being "cured" of "HIV" are all over the mainstream media today, This example from the Huffington Post:
 ..with these two paragraphs:

Specialists say Sunday's announcement, at a major AIDS meeting in Atlanta, offers promising clues for efforts to eliminate HIV infection in children, especially in AIDS-plagued African countries where too many babies are born with the virus.

"You could call this about as close to a cure, if not a cure, that we've seen," Dr. Anthony Fauci of the National Institutes of Health, who is familiar with the findings, told The Associated Press.

A doctor gave this baby faster and stronger treatment than is usual, starting a three-drug infusion within 30 hours of birth. That was before tests confirmed the infant was infected and not just at risk from a mother whose HIV wasn't diagnosed until she was in labor.

It is just outrageous to claim that an infant is carrying an pathogen, based on an antibody blood test given at birth--when it is just fact that pregnant mothers pass antibodies from their bloodstreams, through the placenta, and to the fetus. 

This is another attempt to claim efficacy of highly toxic chemotherapy, which endangers child health rather than protects it. This "HIV cure" will doubtless be used by child "authorities" to subject mothers and babies to AZT and other "anti-retroviral" poison.

--Terry Michael