Monday, March 4, 2013

Baby born with HIV is apparently cured with aggressive drug treatment byDavid Brown at the Washington Post.

To: Dr. David Brown, The Washington Post, re: your story today:
Baby born with HIV is apparently cured with aggressive drug treatment
David,

Some questions you may not have thought to ask:

(1)  What was the race of the mother, treated so aggressively by Caucasian physician Dr. Hannah Gay of Mississippi?
http://www.ummchealth.com/doctors/gay_hannah/ 

(2) And speaking of race, how can it be that African American women are 20x more likely than Caucasian women, according to the CDC,
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/aa/ ...to be "infected" by a purportedly sexually transmitted pathogen? Do they have 20 times as much sex?

(3) What was the informed consent obtained from the mother, for "treatment" of a day-old infant with therapeutic doses of chemotherapy cocktails that have well-assessed, highly toxic adverse effects?

(4) Does it not seem a little odd to you that with 50,000 alleged new "HIV infections" every year in the U.S. fewer than 200 are from mother-to-child transmission, given the claim that this is a blood-borne pathogen?

(5) What is the evidence that 300,000 babies around the world are "infected" with HIV every year from mother-to-child transmission? Fauci uses "one thousand per day." What nice round numbers.  

(6) What were the presenting illnesses--at 30 hours old--of this baby, who was "cured?"  How do you "cure" someone of a retrovirus you don't even know a host has at the time you start administering toxic drugs--which you seem to acknowledge in your story, when you note there's no way to know whether a new-born infant is carrying an active viral pathogen or just its mother's anti-bodies?

This is incredible, even for The HIV-AIDS Industry.  It is just another attempt to line the pockets of drug companies, like Tony Fauci's friends at Gilead Sciences, selling the toxic chemotherapy, sales of which were about $20 billion in 2012, up 250% from just five years before.  And these thousand-dollar-per-month drugs are funded almost entirely by taxpayers.

This "cure" means child-and-family service agencies around the country, already threatening mothers with taking away their babies for refusing "treatment," will have another bullet to hold to the head of those who question drugging a defenseless child.

As always, in your stories, you refuse to quote a single dissenting voice.  Ask Dr. Jay Levy, the "third discoverer of HIV," what he thinks about early drugging.  Ask Dr. Nancy Turner Banks, a Harvard Medical School-educated OBGYN, what she thinks. Ask Dr. Joseph Sonnabend, who treated the first cases of immune deficiency among gay men in New York, what he thinks. (I can supply you with their contact information.)

--Terry Michaels

Free Documentary Screenings on HIV Criminalization on March 7th!


Over 30 thirty states have prosecuted people living with HIV/AIDS for “exposing” others to the virus, typically through consensual and often protected sex, or in cases of fights involving biting or spitting. Yet in a majority of these cases, there was no real threat or risk of HIV transmission. Nevertheless, due to the fear and stigma still surrounding HIV/AIDS, people living with HIV/AIDS can still be tried and convicted as a felon regardless if the virus is actually transmitted and in 33 states, be forced to register as a sex offender.
Clearly, this is bogus.

If you have been charged with an HIV-related crime or civil action – or you represent someone in such action, CONTACT OMSJ IMMEDIATELY.

To help spur the repeal of HIV criminalization laws, Housing Works is proud to announce that Broadway Cares is presenting the screening of two documentaries that illustrate the harm and false logic behind HIV crim laws.

On Thursday, March 7 at 7pm at the SVA Beatrice Theatre, Broadway Cares/Equity Fights AIDS are showing two documentaries: Positive Women: Exposing Injustice, a documentary produced by Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network that details the lives of four HIV-positive women living with HIV/AIDS, and HIV is Not a Crime, a short produced by the Sero Project.

Sunday, March 3, 2013

HIV Baby cure, read the fine print

 the "HIV baby cure" story is REALLY BIG
The claim by "scientists" of an "HIV cure" in a baby, which broke Sunday afternoon at the...
Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections in Atlanta.
...is VERY BIG.

The "study" is to be released tomorrow at the conference. The entire HIV-AIDS Industry public relations apparatus is hyping the hell out of this.  You can bet it will be front page and TV network news Monday.  I have checked the stories that started appearing early Sunday evening at major media web sites, like the New York Times and CNN
 
They are not just reprinting Associated press or Reuters stories.  These are being written by the health reporters for each paper and network and magazine 

You can be assured that this "cure" will be used to hype universal testing and "test and treat," not just for infants but for all age groups.  If you check the stock prices for the ARV pharmaceutical companies Monday, I expect you may find heavy spikes for chemo purveyors like Gilead Sciences.

Read the stories carefully.  The baby's doctor started giving the child the poison 30 hours after birth, in high doses, after the mother tested "positive" at the time of birth and BEFORE the baby had even been tested!  The drugs were continued for months, and then the mother stopped bringing the baby to the clinic. Children and family services apparently tracked her down to force the drugs on her child, at which time more tests were done and the apparent miracle was realized--that the baby no longer "had the virus" even months after 
"treatment" had stopped.  (That's my quick take on what is being claimed; read the stories carefully for your selves.)

This is taking the madness to an all new level.  The "cure" of the "Berlin patient" was claimed to be the result of a radical and ultra expensive bone marrow transplant--not ARV's--and thus could not be claimed as a procedure that could be widely used.  This "cure" is all about the drugs!
--Terry Michael


Claimed "HIV CURE" will subject mothers and babies to AZT poisoning

Claims of a baby being "cured" of "HIV" are all over the mainstream media today, This example from the Huffington Post:
 ..with these two paragraphs:

Specialists say Sunday's announcement, at a major AIDS meeting in Atlanta, offers promising clues for efforts to eliminate HIV infection in children, especially in AIDS-plagued African countries where too many babies are born with the virus.
"You could call this about as close to a cure, if not a cure, that we've seen," Dr. Anthony Fauci of the National Institutes of Health, who is familiar with the findings, told The Associated Press.
A doctor gave this baby faster and stronger treatment than is usual, starting a three-drug infusion within 30 hours of birth. That was before tests confirmed the infant was infected and not just at risk from a mother whose HIV wasn't diagnosed until she was in labor.
It is just outrageous to claim that an infant is carrying an pathogen, based on an antibody blood test given at birth--when it is just fact that pregnant mothers pass antibodies from their bloodstreams, through the placenta, and to the fetus. 

This is another attempt to claim efficacy of highly toxic chemotherapy, which endangers child health rather than protects it. This "HIV cure" will doubtless be used by child "authorities" to subject mothers and babies to AZT and other "anti-retroviral" poison.

--Terry Michael

Breast Milk Kills HIV and Blocks Its Oral Transmission in Humanized Mouse

sciencedaily.com
More than 15 percent of new HIV infections occur in children. Without treatment, only 65 percent of HIV-infected children will live until their first birthday, and fewer than half will make it to the age of two. Although breastfeeding is attributed to a significant number of these infections, most breastfed infants are not infected with HIV, despite prolonged and repeated exposure.

Friday, March 1, 2013

New York City Kidnaps and Force-Drugs Kids


In the summer and fall of 2003, an investigative reporter working undercover at an orphanage in New York City found that the city was allowing foster children in its care to be used as "guinea pigs" for experimental trials of highly toxic and painful drugs.  What Liam Scheff found at Incarnation Children's Center (ICC) in Washington Heights ignited a city scandal in 2004 and into early 2005--a scandal mostly forgotten today but not yet resolved. The New York Press published his article in early 2004, and further articles followed in the London Observer/Guardian and theNew York Postamong other media.  The allegations were even the subject of a BBC documentary, Guinea Pig Kids.
One former city councilman--District 39's Bill de Blasio of Park Slope, Brooklyn--chaired the council's General Welfare Committee and was responsible for the city's Administration for Children's Services (ACS), which referred children to ICC.  De Blasio is our new New York Public Advocate. While we took no direct position in the election, we thought this was a rare opportunity to watch a candidate for this important city post in action, "advocating"--or not--for the families of New York.
Please join us as we continue to ask Public Advocate de Blasio a few questions.  We invite him to participate and will faithfully post his answers here.  And if you would like to question him or comment as well, you can do so at the "Your Questions and Comments" form at the left more:

Guinea Pig Kids Video Featuring Rapper Topic


Thursday, February 28, 2013

Abbott Labs 2006 HIV Test Insert


A different story than what you’re told by Bono, Oprah and Barack.
First, the tests have no standard for interpreting their meaning.
  • From the paper: “At present there is no recognized standard for establishing the presence or absence of antibodies to HIV-1 and HIV-2 in human blood.”
Translation: They do not predict illness in people who are not already ill, morbidly impoverished, taking Aids drugs or street drugs.
  • “The risk of an *asymptomatic [not chronically ill] person with a repeatedly reactive [positive]serum sample developing AIDS or an AIDS-related condition is not known
The tests have no specific, inherent meaning, but meaning is assigned to persons who are in the CDC’s ‘risk group’ They must be ‘interpreted’ for risk group, and not applied to the general population.
  • “Clinical studies continue to clarify and refine the interpretation and medical significance of the presence of antibodies to HIV.”
Note the double-speak – “presence of antibodies.” There is “no standard” for determining the “presence or absence” of antibodies in these tests. The statement above is irrelevant, it has no meaning to this standardless test.
  • AIDS and AIDS-related conditions are clinical syndromes and their diagnosis can only be established clinicallyEIA testing [that’s this test] cannot be used to diagnose AIDS, even if the recommended investigation of reactive specimens suggest suggest?] that the antibodies toHIV are present.”
The tests don’t diagnose, the clinician does, based on – not testing positive or negative – but on the CDC’s ‘risk factors,’ like Blackness, poverty, homosexuality.
  • “Sensitivity for HIV-1 antibodies was computed based on the clinical diagnosis of Aids.”
The tests are validated, not by matching the results with actual infection with any particular, identifiable particle – the “standard” that is missing, but
by using them on people, pre-supposed to be ‘at risk’ for ‘Aids’, that is, people pre-diagnosed with clinical “Aids.”
The tests don’t give the diagnosis – the clinician does – no testing needed. The tests are said to work if and only if you are in the group that is pre-supposed to be

Lindsey Nagel Baby, Rico, removed and forced on HIV drugs

For everyone that saw "HOUSE OF NUMBERS" you will remember your emotions hearing Lindsey Nagel's story. For those lucky to see and meet her in person in a Q and A after the film. you will be further touched and i hope moved as Lindsey story didn't just end after the light when out in the theater, or you turned off your DVD. 

Watch this shocking video for the rest of the story or go to www.saverico.com 
Director of Health and Human Services  
Julie Stevermer
 julies@co.mower.mn.us call (507) 437-9715

The Vendetta: The Kidnapping And Torture of Rico Martinez Nagel

By 

 ”They aren’t gonna quit. It doesn’t end. There can’t be two of them. Can you imagine if Lindsey had a baby after 22 years and the baby lived? Can you imagine? It didn’t happen to Lindsey. It happened to Rico.”

Steve Nagel

We’ve kept quiet about the situation since December, 2012. Lindsey Nagel gave birth to a healthy baby boy on December 19. He was supposed to come home a few days later. He is still not home. He’s remains in the hospital, in state custody, covered in tubes. So battered and destroyed by force fed ARV drugs, the family has begun to wonder if Rico will make it.
“I don’t know if Rico will make it out of the hospital, at this point,” said Rico’s grandfather, Steve Nagel. “He’s basically on life support right now. He’s 7 pounds. He needs his family. He needs love. But they couldn’t let this mother have a baby that lived too. I’m all cried out. It’s just unbelievable.”

Rico and Lindsey

 The same day Rico was born, while Lindsey was resting, three figures appeared at the foot of her bed.  It was an infectious disease doctor, a lawyer and a social worker.  They told her that unless she consented to being tested for HIV, and allowed them to test Rico for HIV, they were going to turn Lindsey in to Mower county Social Services for child endangerment.

Wednesday, February 27, 2013

Robert Scott Bell and Liam Scheff speaking at the The Health Freedom Expo in Long Beach, CA


RESTORING IMMUNITY AND HEALTH SOVEREIGNTY: 
THE POWER TO HEAL IS YOURS!

Speaker: Robert Scott Bell
Time and Date: 5:00 PM Friday, March 1, 2013
Room: 203A
Lecture Description: From gastrointestinal recovery to concerns about asthma, allergies, lung infections, HPV, chronic immune diseases, skin disorders and more. Get the information you need to fully support your good health.

Speaker Biography: Robert Scott Bell, D.A. Hom., homeopathic practitioner, expert in silver therapeutics and has dedicated his life to revealing the healing power within us all. He broadcasts six days a week to 300,000+ listeners. He reveals revolutionary new healing protocols in ways unapproved by government agencies!
LIAM SCHEFF'S OFFICIAL STORIES
Speaker: Liam Scheff
Time and Date: 4:00 PM Friday, March 1, 2013
Room: 203A
Lecture Description: Why is everything you read in the newspaper a lie? Because "official stories exist to protect officials." From government to health care, vaccines to "HIV testing," and into today's sciences--astronomy, evolutionary biology and beyond--the official story we're told is far from true.

Speaker Biography: As a journalist, Liam Scheff has broken national stories of pharmaceutical corruption. Liam is author of the highly-praised book Official Stories and a co-host on the Robert Scott Bell show. http://liamscheff.com

Hiv testing is the new pink triangle


Reading the standard medical literature on HIV tests, you will discover that:
  • The Tests ‘test’ for no one thing.
  • They diagnose no one thing.
  • They do not show infection with any single thing.
HIV tests may tell you that you have an illness, or they may tell you that you are pregnant. They give no single response, and diagnose no single condition. They may indicate immune suppression, or any variety of major or minor ailments.
The complex details of HIV testing are not reported to the public; they remain hidden in the medical and industry journals, and are actively suppressed by major media in public discussion. These are important public issues, and we all should have a clear and unobstructed view of all available data, no matter how it affects or challenges a publicly-held idea or policy.
It is impossible in a court of law to receive a death sentence for any crime as easily as it is to receive a false reading on an HIV test. It is a label that cannot be overcome in court, and cannot be appealed under any circumstance.
But, now it can be appealed. And returned. Return Your HIV Test Diagnosis Now.
——————————————————————————————————————————————
If you are about to be tested, or have recently been tested, then you must understand the technical flaws and limitations of HIV testing, what the tests react with, and how they are interpreted. If you would like help in writing to your doctor, write RTBand we’ll assist you
Know your rights: You have a right to informed consent, a right to read and review all critical literature on a medical procedure before agreeing to undergo it.
Know your rights: You have a right to read and review all critical literature on HIV testing, before submitting to a test. You have a right to choose whether or not to take a test, based on your reading of the critical medical literature on testing. It is your legal right:
  • To review all critical literature on the tests and on testing
  • To take or to not take a test.
Before you test, seek answers to the following questions:
  • How are the tests constructed? How do they work? What do they measure?
  • What are the specific mechanical components of the tests? Where are the parts made? Where do they come from?
  • What makes a test react? What makes a reaction positive or negative?
  • What is the difference between a positive and a negative reaction?
  • What standards are used to interpret a reaction?
  • What other factors are used to determine the meaning or interpretation of a test result?
  • Do the tests measure only one thing? Do they measure what they claim to measure? Do theycross-react, and if so, with what? Why do they cross-react?
  • Who are the tests used on? Where are they issued most often? What gives a test a higher versus a lower “predictive value“?
Excercise your right to informed consent, and make the decision according to a full understanding of the tests, their limitations and uses, as reviewed in twenty-five years of the medical literature.
Read All Entries in the Tests” Category
Exercise your right to informed consent, and make the decision according to a full understanding of the tests, their limitations and uses, as reviewed in twenty-five years of the medical literature.
More on testing below, and at ARAS.ab.ca/test

Wednesday, February 20, 2013

Disclose.tv offers House of Numbers, Full Documentary. Watch for Free

In House of Numbers: Anatomy of an Epidemic, an AIDS film like no other, the HIV/AIDS story is being rewritten. This is the first film to present the uncensored POVs of virtually all the major players; in their own settings, in their own words. It rocks the foundation upon which all conventional wisdom
regarding HIV/AIDS is based. House of Numbers could well be the opening volley in a battle to bring sanity and clarity to an epidemic gone awry.




Read more: http://www.disclose.tv/forum/house-of-numbers-full-documentary-t84702.html#ixzz2LS30gWVQ

Thursday, February 7, 2013

Dr Christian Fiala - interviewed in film 'Positively False"


Dr Christian Fiala, Consultant Obstetrician and Gynaecologist, expresses his deep concern about the mistakes surrounding the infectious hypothesis for HIV/AIDS and in particular the way this has affected the continent of Africa. 
More information at http://positivelyfalsemovie.com and http://immunity.org.uk

Trial By Ordeal: The Life and Death of Christine Maggiore

by Charles Rich

NOTE:  The following is a chapter from my book, "The Living Proof: Confessions of an AIDS survivor".
  
The world is like a ride at an amusement park, and when you choose to go on the ride, you think it's real because that's how powerful our minds are. And the ride goes up and down and round and round. It has thrills and chills and it's very brightly colored and it's very loud and it's fun, for a while. Some people have been on the ride for a long time, and they begin to question: Is this real, or is this just a ride? And other people have remembered, and they come back to us, they say, 'Hey! don't worry, don't be afraid, ever, because, this is just a ride.' And we ... kill those people. Ha ha, 'Shut him up. We have a lot invested in this ride. Shut him up. Look at my furrows of worry. Look at my big bank account and my family. This just has to be real.' It's just a ride – but we always kill those good guys who try and tell us that, you ever notice that? ...And let the demons run amok? Jesus murdered; Martin Luther King murdered; Malcolm X murdered; Gandhi murdered; John Lennon murdered; Reagan ... wounded. But it doesn't matter because it's just a ride. And we can change it anytime we want. It's only a choice. No effort, no work, no job, no savings of money. A choice, right now, between fear and love.” – Bill Hicks, Revelations

In the previous chapter (How I “got” HIV), I intended the word “got” in the title to have a double meaning. On the one hand, I wanted to explain my theory on why I began to test false positive in 1998 (which I did,) but I also wanted to explain how I “got” (i.e. “comprehended”) what it really means to be “HIV-positive”. Once the chapter was written, however, I realized that I'd forgotten to include the latter subject, and I was unable to find a way to include it without the addition feeling tacked-on.

The Other Side of AIDS, HIV and AIDS Documentary Film