Colour-coded blood test that turns blue if you have HIV is 10 times more sensitive than current methods

• HIV sensor is 10 times more sensitive and a fraction of the cost of current methods
• If virus is in blood sample makes tiny gold nanoparticles form irregular patterns, which changes colour of fluid to blue
• If no virus present solution turns red
• 
  

By CLAIRE BATES www.dailymail.co.uk

A test for HIV that is 10 times more sensitive and a fraction of the cost of current methods, has been developed by British scientists.

It uses nanotechnology to give a result that can be seen with the naked eye by turning a sample red or blue.

Developed by scientists at Imperial College in London, the technique offers the promise of better diagnosis and treatment in the developing world.

Research leader Molly Stevens, said: 'Our approach affords for improved sensitivity, does not require sophisticated instrumentation and it is ten times cheaper.'

Diagnosing HIV without using an HIV Test

Leading experts discuss diagnosing people in the West with HIV, without doing an HIV antibody test.

HIV testing cannot detect "HIV" itself

Since HIV testing cannot detect "HIV" itself, and since the test kits currently used to diagnose alleged "HIV infection" only rely on surrogate markers such as antibodies or genetic material, a study should exist somewhere in the published medical literature which shows that at least one type of surrogate test for HIV has been validated for accuracy by the direct isolation of HIV itself from people who test antibody, RNA , or DNA positive.

A study that validates HIV test kits is missing from the medical literature and It has been almost 30 years since the alleged discovery of HIV and the development and marketing of the HIV antibody test kits, yet it appears that no study ever validated HIV tests by the direct purification of HIV from persons who test positive or have a "viral load."

Dr. Luc Montagnier, HIV and AIDS truth exposed, Un-cuted footage from "House of Numbers"

The un-cut footage from documentary "House of Numbers" reveals truth about AIDS as told by Dr. Luc Montagnier. AIDS can be reversed. Nutrition is the answer. Hear it straight from the co-discoverer of HIV. Posted by NaturalNews.com

The transcript between FilmMaker of "House of Numbers" and Dr. Luc Montagnier

Magic Johnson Partners With OraSure on HIV Awareness Campaign

(The Root) -- "No, I'm not on any magical drugs. I've been saying that for 21 years," Magic Johnson told a small crowd of journalists and HIV- and AIDS-prevention workers over lunch at New York City's Gramercy Park Hotel on Wednesday.

The NBA champion and star of the Los Angeles Lakers, after receiving the life-changing news that he was HIV-positive, announced his status to a gaggle of television cameras in 1991. Since then he has worked to change the way the world perceives people who carry the virus.

OraSure CEO Douglas Michels on the company’s partnership with Magic Johnson and its new rapid HIV test that is now available for in-home use. 

OraSure Technologies Inc. (OSUR) Stock: http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=OSUR

Ask for the Kit insert before your next HIV and AIDS test.

READ: In Home HIV Tests Now Available to Mislead http://bit.ly/Q8olNQ

But initially, Johnson had to seek someone to guide him through the process of dealing with his disease, both emotionally and physically. Now he is an international ambassador for HIV and AIDS prevention, the self-proclaimed "face of this disease," and he's endorsing the at-home HIV test called OraQuick.

Produced by the pharmaceutical company OraSure, the test is the first FDA-approved rapid HIV test, which produces results in 20 minutes. It retails at pharmacies like CVS or Duane Reade, as well as online for about $39. OraQuick, which has been used by health care providers for just over a decade, uses a mouth swab to detect antibodies to HIV-1 and HIV-2 in oral fluid. And while this seems to be great news for people who would rather learn their status in their own bathroom, according to the Food and Drug Administration, the test does come with a caveat.

IMDB Quiz: House of Numbers: How much do you know?

http://www.imdb.com/games/guess/tt1311710

Share your story on a new Website: Living Without HIV Drugs

Living without HIV drugs

This website is dedicated to the true-life stories of people who have two important things in common:

• 1. We have all been diagnosed as HIV-Positive at some point in our lives, and
• 2. We have all stopped, or never started taking the HIV medications normally prescribed by our doctors and clinics and hospitals, and are living healthy, happy lives.

We want to share our stories with you, in hopes that they can be an inspiration and provide you with the hope that you, too, can live without HIV drugs and their very serious and damaging side effects.

More Truths about Truvada: it's a combined HIV drug comprising Emtriva and Viread

sharing this page from Carl Grinde's Blog:
 Now, for the first time, adults who do not have HIV but are at risk of becoming infected can take a medication to reduce the risk of sexual transmission of the virus.
Truvada is made by Gilead.

http://www.gilead.com/pr_933190157

Truvada is made by Gilead. Side effects: "new or worsening kidney problems, thinning of the bones (osteopenia), which could lead to fractures, inflammation, diarrhea, dizziness, nausea, headache, fatigue, abnormal dreams, sleeping problems, rash, depression, changes in the distribution of body fat, stomach area (abdomen) pain, headache, a buildup of acid in the blood (lactic acidosis), decreased weight, Serious liver problems (hepatotoxicity), with liver enlargement (hepatomegaly), and fat in the liver (steatosis). Symptoms of liver problems include your skin or the whites of your eyes turning yellow (jaundice), dark colored urine, light colored stools, lack of appetite, nausea, and/or pain in your lower stomach area. In some cases, these serious conditions have lead to death." 
Quotes from www.truvada.com 

Ed Asner Narrates New Documentary AIDS film

Nicole Swiren's documentary, Denialism, The Death of AIDS, can now be downloaded in it's entirety, and an accompanying DVD features a full interview with acclaimed actor Ed Asner.

Saturday, November 13th, 3:15 to 5:10 PM Beverly Garland's Theater 4222 Vineland Avenue, North Hollywood, California isffhollywood.org

Woman Sues Brooklyn Doctor For Telling Her She Has HIV

By James Fanelli, DNAinfo Reporter/Producer
"One of them allegedly stopped the woman and tried to hearten her by noting that sometimes another HIV test shows the initial results were wrong."

NEW YORK CITY — A Harlem woman who didn't want to know whether she had contracted HIV is suing her doctor for breaking the news that she tested positive for the deadly virus.

The 31-year-old woman claims Dr. Pavel Yutsis violated state law by testing her without her consent and then delivering the devastating results — even though the revelation likely benefited her health.

"I was tricked. I never signed any paper," the woman, who filed her lawsuit as "Jane Doe" to protect her privacy, told DNAinfo.com last week. "It was a slap in the face."

Alarming increase in the number of retractions of scientific papers

www.nytimes.com and www.npr.com
Misdeeds, Not Mistakes, Behind Most Scientific Retractions

When there's something really wrong with a published study, the journal can retract it, much like a carmaker recalling a flawed automobile.

But are the errors that lead to retractions honest mistakes or something more problematic?

A newly published analysis finds that more than two-thirds of biomedical papers retracted over the past four decades were the result of misconduct, not error. That's much higher than previous studies of retractions had found.

That comes as no surprise to those of us who have witnessed the corruption of science by the tens of billions of dollars with which Tony Fauci and his friends at the drug companies have bribed "researchers" in The HIV-AIDS Industry over the past 28 years.
--Terry Michael

Risk Reduction and HIV Testing Messages Sent Through Social Networking Media Can Be Effective

Sean Young, PhD, MS Department of Family Medicine UCLA

This is part of an internal email mailed to a Gay Youth group:

...The machine is part of a small ‘pilot’ research study being conducted by a UCLA researcher named Sean Young (at the UCLA Center for HIV Intervention, Prevention, and Treatment Services). Pilots are small projects that are designed to establish the feasibility of answering a specific research question. If the results are promising, then the investigator can apply for funding for a full scale study.
 
This particular study is designed to assess whether risk reduction and HIV testing messages sent through social networking media can be effective in motivating someone to obtain an HIV home test kit from a vending machine. So the study is looking at both social network ‘diffusion’ of risk reduction information as well as acceptability of use of vending machines to obtain test kits.

How Accurate is the HIV Confirmation Test?

Fears over Aids 'miracle pill": Truvada

MARIKA HILL at www.stuff.co.nz

Fears are being raised that a ''magic pill'' could spark a new wave of the Aids epidemic in Auckland.

The HIV treatment drug Truvada is being touted as a way to protect against infection in the United States and local AIDs campaigners fear this false promise will lead to complacency about safe sex.

POPULAR HIV DRUG MAY CAUSE MEMORY DECLINES

Release Date: 09/27/2012

Johns Hopkins study suggests the commonly prescribed anti-retroviral drug efavirenz attacks brain cells

The way the body metabolizes a commonly prescribed anti-retroviral drug that is used long term by patients infected with HIV may contribute to cognitive impairment by damaging nerve cells, a new Johns Hopkins research suggests.

Nearly 50 percent of people infected with HIV will eventually develop some form of brain damage that, while mild, can affect the ability to drive, work or participate in many daily activities. It has long been assumed that the disease was causing the damage, but Hopkins researchers say the drug efavirenz may play a key role.

Note the second paragraph of the press release from HopkinsMedicine.org, bold italics emphasis added by me:

Nearly 50 percent of people infected with HIV will eventually develop some form of brain damage that, while mild, can affect the ability to drive, work or participate in many daily activities. It has long been assumed that the disease was causing the damage, but Hopkins researchers say the drug efavirenz may play a key role.

On occasion, a little bit of  truth--like the words above--escapes from the National Institutes of Health "HIV-AIDS" knowledge monopoly, created by Dr. Anthony Fauci in 1984, when he was named head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). Still directing NIAID 28 years later, Fauci's fame as an un-elected bureaucrat is matched only by the late FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover.

One of the most media-noticed science bureaucrats in modern American history, Dr. Fauci has had virtual control over all policy decisions related to the American government response to the collapse of immune systems in a subset of urban gay males in the early 1980's. In his NIAID position, Fauci has controlled tens of billions of dollars in "HIV-AIDS" research grants from NIH, spread around the country and the world. He has never allowed one dollar of U.S. taxpayer money to be spent on any theory of "AIDS" other than the single retroviral pathogen theory eagerly advanced by his NIH/National Cancer Institute colleague, Dr. Robert Gallo, in a press conference on April 23, 1984--before publication of any scientific papers claiming that an amorphous immune deficiency disorder noticed among urban American gay males was "probably" caused by a mysterious retrovirus.

Fauci has been the U.S. government's chief proponent of "anti-retroviral" (ARV) drugs, now a $17 billion segment of the pharmaceutical industry (as of the end 2011.)

Thus, it is not often that researchers go off script, and admit that the highly toxic ARV chemotherapy is the real cause of ill health in those said to be "infected" with a retrovirus. "AIDS by prescription," as Dr. Peter Duesberg observed many years ago.

When will this iatrogenic illness madness end?

--Terry Michael

People infected with HIV typically take a cocktail of medications to suppress the virus, and many will take the drugs for decades. Efavirenz is known to be very good at controlling the virus and is one of the few that crosses the blood-brain barrier and can target potential reservoirs of virus in the brain. Doctors have long believed that it might be possible to alleviate cognitive impairment associated with HIV by getting more drugs into the brain, but researchers say more caution is needed because there may be long-term effects of these drugs on the brain.

HIV/AIDS TRUTH & RECONCILIATION COMMISSION

HIV/AIDS TRUTH & RECONCILIATION COMMISSION
http://www.dbnbusinessfair.com/

In Home HIV Tests Now Available to Mislead

Posted by textgenie
HIV Boys Pull Another Fast One With Frightening Easy Test

Chances of False Positive About 1 in 18, or 63,000 People In All

But Even Accurate Tests By Definition Useless and Dangerous

The Times boosted the July 4 celebrations of those leading the biggest scientific scam in history today with a top right front page story by its resident fellow traveler in HIV/AIDS, Donald G. McNeil, entitled Rapid H.I.V. Home Test Wins Federal Approval.

The story bears close examination as a new high point in the HIV promotion crowd’s success in stirring up trouble for which they ask vast funding to deal with.

One interesting aspect is that as stated (after the report was corrected) the tests are quite insensitive to HIV antibodies, so they are somewhat inaccurate in responding to true positives. The 92% accuracy for positives means that 8% of positive results will register negative. It’s 4999 in 5000 accuracy for negatives means (when the arithmetic is added up) that about 5 per cent of the positives it registers will be false. That is, 1 in 20 will be wrong.

TERRY MICHAEL INTERVIEW WITH ROBERT GALLO at the XIX International AIDS Society Conference

posted by Terry Michael:
I did with Dr. Robert Gallo at the XIX International AIDS Society Conference in Washington, DC, July 22, 2012. I had to transcribe it, because it's a poor quality audio, and Gallo is a hard interview. His syntax makes it difficult to follow him on the audio, but it should be easier with this transcript:

Here's the audio file you can download, as Windows Media Audio (.WMA):

And here it is (much larger file) as an .MP3:

I asked Gallo mostly about Luc Montagnier, and what he (Gallo) thought of his one-time colleague's views on "HIV co-factors" and Montagnier's assertion that we can rid ourselves of HIV "in just a few weeks if you have a good immune system," in the interview from the film "House of Numbers"

I also asked Gallo about his views on use of so-called "ARV's" for PrEP, or "pre-exposure prophylaxis," on which he equivocated, but said he was "not on that bandwagon."

At one point, Gallo tried to go "off-the-record"--even though his press aide early in the interview cautioned him that "you're on the record."  Gallo attempted to go off-the-record in what I regarded as an attempt to slander Montagnier by suggesting he (Montagnier) was trying to personally profit from his theories on nutrition and AIDS. As a journalist, I believe an interviewee has the right to ask if he can go off-the-record, during the course of an interview.  But, in this case, he did not ask to change the on-the-record condition; he just asserted he was doing it. In any case, I don't believe an interviewee should be able go off-the-record to engage in an ad hominem attack. That quote, in context, is copied below.

9 people out of 10 have no idea why they believe in the theories of HIV and AIDS

HIV revelation leads to Dallas woman's murder 

posted by: Cornelius D. Allen

I am learning more everyday was a newbie dissident. My (and others') interaction in this story's comments section has taught me a few things. My goal on commenting on this story was not to persuade existing mainstream believers about the non-existence of HIV. I was targeting those agnostic individuals, if you will.

In all of that, I gained valuable insight into why people believe the mainstream 

hypothesis even in lieu of not knowing WHY they believe it.

I am betting dollars to donuts that 8-9 people out of 10 have no idea why they believe in the HIV/AIDS myth. Ask them how they know HIV allegedly causes AIDS and they won't quote the original studies or for that matter any "scientific evidence" for the mainstream hypothesis/myth.

There were a few people in there that scared me with their "reasoning": they believe that mere consensus makes an idea a fact or that personal experiences makes something real. Their "logic" is not really logic.

In the future, I will have a more disciplined approach to answering the rebuttals before they are stated. I have determined that you have to counter these shoddy ways of thinking when presenting a rather radical thesis that HIV does not exists and therefore can not be the cause of AIDS.

Watch the "The Greater Good" documentary film on the vaccine debate in America today.

The Greater Good is a documentary film that looks behind the fear, hype and politics that have polarized the vaccine debate in America today. The film re-frames the emotionally charged issue and offers, for the first time, an opportunity for a rational and scientific discussion.

Support the filmmakers through purchasing the streaming version of the film

TOP Documentary Stream: "House Of Numbers – Anatomy Of An Epidemic"

"HOUSE OF NUMBERS - Watch Anatomy Of An Epidemic"

 Free Online here:

 

The documentary titled “House of Numbers: Anatomy of an epidemic” follows the expedition of a Canadian filmmaker, Brent Leung down into the slums of South Africa, where he studies the prevalence of AIDS and HIV disease. It tackles many question such as, what is AIDS. What is HIV? Although, a cure may not be in close sight, but is there anything that is being done to slow down the progress of the disease or even get aid to the people in this impoverished region. The disease began flooding the front page of newspapers during the early 80’s and the number of people, who were afflicted with this disease, began escalating by two-folds every second.

Ever since then, AIDS and HIV may have been the talk of the town, but the disease is not understood by the people and there are several ridiculous taboos that shroud the issue. Leung further observes that the health policy in South Africa may have gone off-course and a body that was formed to study and research the disease fails to perform its function now. Millions of dollars were given to the South African authorities every year by the UNAIDS. Bureaucracy and corruption may have caused this epidemic to go out of hand a bit, but the documentary aims to educate the entire world about the scourge of AIDS in South Africa.

The documentary features interviews from some of the most influential people, who play a pivotal role in their respective fields. From political figures to scientists, government officials, activists, survivors and the sufferers; the documentary encompasses the point of views of all. Leung has used a very objective tone and approach in making the issues known that the audiences will find most engaging. He has unraveled the conflicting opinions of people and the measures that are being taken to bring the epidemic under control and enable the people to restore their health and lives back to normal.